Sept. 29, 2006: Difference between revisions

From ReddNet
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
* Current status of deployment effort: Fermi, ORNL, etc. (Bobby)
* Current status of deployment effort: Fermi, ORNL, etc. (Bobby)
* Do we have a chance of getting a REDDnet node at CERN (Paul, Martin)
* Do we have a chance of getting a REDDnet node at CERN (Paul, Martin)
* Status of AMPATH testing (Surya)
* Status of AMPATH link(Surya)
**Dedicated machines up and running?
**Had a general discussion of the problem of long RTT and latency on this link.
**Has Martin gotten his accounts?
**We need to get better data. But the key point is that we don't seem to be making any progress in this area. We seem to be blocked by the "dirty little secret" of HP networking. The approach that depends on careful control, expert tuning of the backbone routers won't scale, and we may have encountered that here.
** Current solutions seem to depend on artificial tricks that won't scale.
* Since the hardware that goes to SC will be split up and shipped from Tampa to their REDDnet locations, do we need a post SC06 deployment plan?
* Since the hardware that goes to SC will be split up and shipped from Tampa to their REDDnet locations, do we need a post SC06 deployment plan?



Revision as of 09:44, 29 September 2006

Probable Attendees

  • Blackwell (SFA)
  • Hagewood, Assad (Nevoa)
  • Beck, Moore(UTK)
  • Sheldon, Tackett, Pathak, Brown (VU)
  • Swany (UDel)

Current Agenda (Start time this week, 10:30EDT/9:30CDT)

Application Communities

  • AmericaView (PR)

Deployment and Operations

  • Current status of deployment effort: Fermi, ORNL, etc. (Bobby)
  • Do we have a chance of getting a REDDnet node at CERN (Paul, Martin)
  • Status of AMPATH link(Surya)
    • Had a general discussion of the problem of long RTT and latency on this link.
    • We need to get better data. But the key point is that we don't seem to be making any progress in this area. We seem to be blocked by the "dirty little secret" of HP networking. The approach that depends on careful control, expert tuning of the backbone routers won't scale, and we may have encountered that here.
    • Current solutions seem to depend on artificial tricks that won't scale.
  • Since the hardware that goes to SC will be split up and shipped from Tampa to their REDDnet locations, do we need a post SC06 deployment plan?

Technology: Hardware, Software

  • Current state of the components of the L-Store software Suite(Alan, et. al)
  • Availability of alternative versions of the IBP depot code. (Micah)
  • Current state of the Nevoa components and tools (Hunter)
  • Agreement to discuss the formulation of a standard directory protocol in at the Chicago meeting (i.e. on Dec. 3, the day before the large meeting).

Organization and Funding Opportunities

  • Status of NSF PIRE
    • Vandy has given approval to go ahead on the NSF PIRE
    • 6 page preprop due in Oct. 30.
  • What's happening with the SBIR?
    • EoN systems is working on back-up capabilities under L-Store IBP
    • Due Date:

Events, Education, Outreach

  • SC06?
    • An SC06 page has been added to the Wiki (linked from "REDDnet at work")
    • Plans for hardware and demonstrations. Need a good description of what will be demonstrated as the Vanderbilt booth so that we can distribute it to people we want to come see what we can do.
    • Description of Jian's Demo:

Creating a multiuser visualization facility based on distributed and heterogeneous resources has proved to be an elusive challenge for the high performance computing and visualization community. We have developed a highly deployable solution to this problem. Our solution uses a collection of freely available, unscheduled and unreserved storage and computing resources, distributed across the network, to provide the essential infrastructure that such a visualization facility needs. Our demonstration will show that large scale visualization of cutting edge simulation datasets can be shared among multiple distributed users from the same pool of distributed resources, requiring only a standard Internet connection for each user.

    • Working with Ultralight?
    • Working with OSG/Fermi?
    • Engaging with ORNL about standing up an L-Store/SRM at their site.
    • Status of Ultralight plans (Alan)
  • Plans for Internet2 Side meeting (Terry, Micah)

Action Items