Deployment: Current state, plans for next 6 months, issues raised.

From ReddNet
Revision as of 08:16, 21 April 2008 by Sheldonp (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • sites that are up except:
    • umich - 4 sites up, 8 not. need to coordinate with local person, waiting now for that. they are having switching problems, dying hardware, (mis-configured?).
    • need to request an IT contact
    • had to buy a new KVM - that turned out not to be the problem, but a mis-configured switch there. extra KVM is at Vandy, so we have a spare
  • need a technical contact/site user level agreement for what is required.
  • UFL and UMich are only places without an IT contact, and this may be what we have at these places.
  • deploying latest depot code on all depots as we speak.
  • Oak Ridge - not brought up yet.
    • productive meeting end of March
    • we will be put outside ORNL's perimeter
    • same area that TeraGrid hardware is
    • so we could be part of TeraGrid...
    • Dan has some ideas for tests to run across the TeraGrid network
    • and John will integrate with his activities
    • communication between David Giles (at ORNL) and Bobby to get those boxes online. John is ultimately responsible for anything that happens but Bobby and David have a plan that he accepts.
    • David will have SUDO persmissions account on the depot hardware, Bobby will start this as soon as Michigan is done
  • New sites?
    • First one below is solid, second has been offered, the rest...???
    • UTK - Gerald R.
    • LoC - if they want...
    • AmericaView sites? Wisconsin? Alaska?
    • Meeting of the executive committee?
    • Further depot deployments should be driven by applications...
    • OSG?
    • SuraGrid
  • deployment/upgrade experience from recent upgrades, plans for future
  • monitoring, user info,...